Investigation II

Reading the Wabanaki Landscape

What features of Cushing's shoreline would have drawn Wabanaki communities back across generations?

[HC]High-Confidence Inference
Historical Background

The Casco Bay islands sit within the Wabanaki homeland. Repeated use of specific coves and terraces produced shell deposits and cultural landscapes that persist today.

Landscape Analysis

Sheltered coves paired with raised, dry terraces and short carries to freshwater are consistent with seasonal camps documented across coastal Maine.

What we know
  • Casco Bay lies within the Wabanaki homeland.
  • Repeated seasonal use of specific coves and terraces produced shell deposits across coastal Maine.
  • Cushing has raised, dry terraces above sheltered coves with short carries to freshwater.
Evidence
  • [DOC]Documented

    Regional synthesis of Wabanaki landscape use in coastal Maine (Bourque, 2001).

  • [HC]High ConfidenceOn the ground →

    Terrace and cove morphology observed on the island.

Competing hypotheses
The Spring Cove terraces saw repeated seasonal use
[HC]High Confidence

The terrace type matches the documented regional pattern.

Evidence for
  • + Morphology, aspect, drainage and water access all fit the pattern.
Evidence against
  • Erosion and resort-era grading obscure pre-contact surfaces.
  • Pattern-matching is not a site record.
Current assessment
[HC]High Confidence

This history makes a landscape argument, not a site claim, and holds that the appropriate next step is consultation rather than survey. Nothing here should be read as identifying an archaeological site.

What would change our mind
  • ·Any published state survey covering the island.
  • ·Guidance from Wabanaki communities on what should and should not be recorded publicly.
What we should investigate next
  • ·Establish the appropriate channel for consultation before any further fieldwork.
  • ·Photograph eroding scarps from a distance for monitoring only.
What would settle it
  • ·Identify raised terraces above modern high tide.
  • ·Locate freshwater within short carry of the shoreline.
  • ·Observe eroding scarps for shell without disturbing them.
Expected Evidence
  • ·Shell midden fragments in eroding banks.
  • ·Terrace geometry inconsistent with post-contact grading.
Counterarguments
  • ·Erosion and later resort-era grading obscure pre-contact surfaces.
Open Research Questions
  • ·Which terraces best match the pattern of documented Wabanaki camps?
  • ·How should observations be shared with Wabanaki communities?
Places involved
Sources
  • [1] Bourque, B. (2001). Twelve Thousand Years: American Indians in Maine.
Continue the trail